Herring supports court’s gay-marriage decision

 

By Liz Butterfield
Capital News Service

The fight for marriage equality for same-sex couples in Virginia continues to progress through the courts this week after a federal judge ruled the state’s ban on gay marriage is unconstitutional.

Federal District Judge Arenda Wright Allen struck down the law used in the controversial Bostic v. Rainey case as unconstitutional in Norfolk’s federal court on Thursday (Feb. 13). Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring declared his support of the ruling against the same-sex marriage ban in the commonwealth.

“The ruling by Judge Arenda Wright Allen is yet another step forward in the long road toward ensuring that all Virginians are treated fairly and equally under the law,” Herring said.

Herring announced just days after coming into office his administration would not support the commonwealth’s law in federal court.

In her 41-page opinion, the judge cited violations of the due process and equal protection clauses of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution as factors that ultimately reversed the ban.

“What Judge Wright Allen affirmed is that couples like them who are committed to sharing the marital bond deserve to be treated equally under the law,” Herring said.

Opponents of the decision are expected to support an appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

About 57 percent of voters ratified the same-sex marriage ban, known as the Marshall-Newman Amendment or the Virginia Marriage Amendment, in 2006. The law strictly defines marriage as exclusively between one man and one woman, and refuses to recognize similar legal status for other couples.

While the appeal progresses, same-sex couples will not be able to marry in Virginia because of a stay on the execution of the decision issued by Wright Allen.

Virginia Solicitor General Stuart Raphael argued the case on the behalf of the commonwealth. Timothy Bostic, Tony London, Carol Schall and Mary Townley acted as plaintiffs in the case before the Norfolk court.

Herring reversed Virginia’s legal position on its stance in Bostic v. Rainey upon entering office in late January. During his 2013 election campaign, Herring said publicly he would investigate the constitutional issues of Virginia’s law before changing the commonwealth’s political position.

“When I ran for the office of attorney general I promised the people of Virginia that regardless of my personal support for marriage equality I would conduct a rigorous independent analysis of the constitution’s questions before determining the state’s legal position in this case,” Herring said. “I concluded that based on extensive court precedent . . . marriage is a fundamental right protected by the United States Constitution.”

A class action lawsuit challenging the same-sex marriage ban still is pending review in a federal court in Harrisonburg.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Staff/Contributed
About Staff/Contributed 4260 Articles
The Rappahannock News welcomes contributions from any and all members of the community. Email news and photos to editor@rappnews.com or call us at 540-675-3338.

2 Comments

  1. Hi Don,

    You got a few things backwards in your comment.

    Let me elucidate for you:

    1. The VA Government didn’t pass any “gay laws”.

    2. The law in question was passed by referendum in 2006. Virginia voters passed it.

    3. The law actually banned a couple from marrying should both happen to sport a ding-dong or a woo-woo and if that couple was legally married in another state, VA wouldn’t recognize their betrothal.

    4. A Federal, not State, judge just struck it down. The VA Atty General has voiced his support of the decision.

    5. The word is written “Lord” never “lord”. My 7th grade English teacher, Sister Catherine, equated not capitalizing a reference to Him, be it pronoun or proper, with blasphemy!

    Peace be upon thee,

    Chris

    P.S. I think gay marriages can be fine…but gay weddings are always FABULOUS!

Comments are closed.