Spending, health care are issues in 7th district

Protester Hall Wingfield was denied entry at an Eric Cantor campaign appearance in Culpeper Monday because, police told him, his face was covered by a mask. Wingfield was dressed as a chicken. Photo by Carl Zitzmann.

By Dan Roem
Special to the Rappahannock News
The congressional race in the 7th District of Virginia is inherently as much about national issues as it is about local ones if for no other reason than the high-ranking position in Congress held by the incumbent.

Rep. Eric Cantor, the Republican Party’s minority whip in the House of Representatives, counts the votes in the lead-up to floor fights on major legislation. He is running against Democratic Party candidate Rick Waugh and Tea Party candidate Floyd Bayne in the Nov. 2 election.

Bayne and Waugh have debated. Cantor has not, citing scheduling conflicts.

However, Cantor released a string of public statements during the last month arguing the case for a GOP takeover of the House. Republicans need to win 39 seats in order to claim a majority. Several national political analysts are pegging the party’s potential net gains to be above 40 while losing few seats in the process.

One idea Cantor touted in an editorial is to end congressional “earmarks,” which are funding projects attached to legislation usually by individual members of Congress. When approved, that direct government spending can pay for anything from transportation to studying the DNA of bears, as Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) often said on the presidential campaign trail in 2008.

Waugh claimed that earmarks can be useful for road improvements while Cantor wrote that earmarks “have become the poster child for Washington’s wasteful spending binges.”

Regarding targeted government spending, Waugh said that more broadband connections are needed in the Town of Gordonsville and Madison County and that cell phone service is inadequate in many places like Rappahannock and Page counties.

The Candidates

Candidate: Eric Cantor, incumbent
Age: 47
Party: Republican
Residence: Richmond
Experience: 10 years in Congress; House minority whip; member of the House Ways and Means Committee; appointed head of Republican Economic Solutions Group; former state House of Delegates member (R-73rd)
Web site: www.ericcantor.com

Candidate: Rick Waugh
Age: 36
Party: Democratic
Residence: Louisa
Experience: Social worker, therapist, volunteer organizer for Barack Obama 2008
Web site: www.rickwaugh.com

Candidate: Floyd Bayne
Age: 53
Party: Independent Green (Tea Party)
Residence: Midlothian
Experience: Supermarket employee, Civil War re-enactor, hockey referee, businessman
Web site: www.floydbayne.com

“It’s absolutely ridiculous that you can go to a county and not be able to have access to your boss, to have access to your work, to have access to anything unless you use a land line,” said Waugh. He said federal stimulus money, something Cantor voted against, could be used to expand broadband access.

Bayne’s opposition to Cantor comes from the incumbent being insufficiently conservative in Bayne’s view. The challenger’s Web site cites Cantor’s votes for the Trouble Assets Relief Program, No Child Left Behind, the Patriot Act, the Real ID law and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act as instances where Cantor strayed from the concept of limited government.

“[Cantor] is a career politician and he suddenly became concerned with fiscal responsibility when the Democrats took control of Congress. But under Bush, he had no problem spending money and growing the deficit as long as the Republican Party said it was O.K.,” said Bayne last week on NBC.

He and Cantor do agree in their joint opposition to the health care reform bill signed into law this year. Cantor joined 215 other House members in voting against the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Waugh said he would have voted for it. Cantor said three times during the House floor debate in March that “this trillion dollar overhaul will do the opposite” of something he deemed positive.

“We believe that this government must stop spending money that it doesn’t have,” said Cantor in his prepared speech.

Waugh said that in talking with district residents, the aspect of the health care bill that brought out the most opposition came from the coverage mandates. He said the GOP does not have a better, competing plan though.

“Eric Cantor’s view of health care is that if you don’t have insurance, and you can’t afford it, you die if you get sick,” said Waugh.

Waugh’s remarks echo those made last year on the floor of the House by Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla). A YouTube video shows Grayson’s floor speech during which he said, “If you get sick, America, the Republican health care plan is this: die quickly. That’s right. The Republicans want you to die quickly if you get sick.”

Cantor’s public opposition to the health care reform law passed by Congress centers around its associated cost, taxes and mandates. He previously mentioned during interviews that the preexisting conditions ban and allowing those who lose their jobs to not “necessarily” lose their health care are general areas of agreement between Republicans between and Democrats. Waugh said those items, which were included in the bill Cantor voted against, are why he supports the law.

“After looking at the bill, I would vote for it because it saves peoples lives. If I voted against it, I would be voting against children born with preexisting conditions,” said Waugh.

He added that the Republican leadership “that includes Cantor has said that they don’t want their tax dollars to have everybody get health care… My argument to that is that, yeah, your tax dollars are going to help folks.”

Waugh specifically cited hospitals receiving government payments for treating those without insurance during emergency room visits.

Earlier this month on PBS, Cantor said that “Right now, the ability for insurance companies to deny preexisting, existing coverage shouldn’t be tolerated.”

Cantor then touted the existence of a GOP plan he said would tackle such an issue.

“And we had an answer for that in the Republican proposal because we say you should begin to form and adequately fund universal access programs at the state level, and then provide a cap as to what the premiums should be in those programs, so no one is left without coverage,” said Cantor.

About Staff/Contributed 5289 Articles
The Rappahannock News welcomes contributions from any and all members of the community. Email news and photos to editor@rappnews.com or call us at 540-675-3338.


  1. Cantor Must Join Unemployment Line


    I am a constituent of Eric Cantor residing in the Woodlake subdivision of Chesterfield County, although I am a Democrat, I have voted for Cantor in the past. Some of his largest financial supporters live in my neighborhood.

    As a constituent I am outraged that he is so arrogant that he refuses even to debate his opponents. I listened to the debate and both candidates have some good ideas. Rick Waugh is especially impressive.

    Cantor inherited his seat from Tom Bliley and has done absolutely nothing for the Seventh District in 10 years. He undoubtedly feels that he has a divine right to his inherited seat in Congress. Although he claims to be against bailouts he refused to vote for the “too big to fail” legislation” that will prevent bailouts in the future. He claims to be against deficits, yet he supported all the Bush policies, that turned a tremendous surplus into the trillion dollar deficit which Obama inherited, and turned an unemployment rate of 4.6 percent into an unemployment rate in excess of ten percent. The Bush/Cantor policies caused the mortgage fiasco which still plagues the economy, and has financially ruined millions of Americans. There are currently thousands of houses in the district that have been lost and are still being lost through foreclosure.

    Does anyone remember when President Bush’s officials were delivering billions of dollars in trucks filled with cash to corrupt Iraqi politicians? Those people are now living in Dubai as multi-millionaires enjoying the huge sums of cash which were given to them by the Bush administration and supported wholeheartedly by Cantor.

    Cantor says he is against the deficit, but he is even today supporting the ridiculous policy of the U.S. Taxpayers borrowing to give millionaires and billionaires such as the Koch brothers an average of $150,000 per year at a total cost of seven trillion dollars.

    And Cantor needs to answer for the fact that he is personally receiving thousands of dollars from Israeli support, and supporting the U.S. Chamber of Commerce which is counseling the outsourcing of U.S. jobs to foreign countries.

    During his years in Congress, Circuit City headquartered in his District shut down completely. This was one of the largest retailers in the nation with thousands of jobs in the District. S and K, also a national company headquartered in the Seventh District, went out of business causing the loss of many jobs. Many other companies in his district have closed or relocated. Cantor has been in Congress 10 years and has not helped bring one major employer to the District.

    I am personally calling his large financial supporters who I personally know and asking them to demand that he debate his opponents.

    He is quoted in the article that appeared in your Oct. 16 edition as emphasizing “the need to find ways to work with the Democratic administration” yet he voted no on the recently enacted legislation to help small businesses that was originally proposed by Republicans.

    In his T.V. campaign advertisement he states, “We need to cut taxes especially on small businesses” yet he voted against the legislation passed by Congress a few weeks ago which does that.

    As a small business man, frankly I strongly resent Eric Cantor’s hypocrisy and the fact that he is my representative in Congress.

    His talking point that “Washington just doesn’t get it” is ludicrous, considering the fact that he is Washington and the cause of our economic woes. He needs to join the unemployment line this Nov. 2.

Comments are closed.