While we cannot say with certainty that cell phone service would have changed the outcome of the recent fatal incident in Sperryville, we can show a logical argument in favor of wider cell phone service providing a public good.
I would ask the opponents of cell phone service to present their logical argument against expanded cell service in the county.
If the argument is scientific, please provide reliable, reputable sources. If the argument is aesthetic, justify the aesthetic benefits against the potential human cost in our far-flung and poorly connected community.
Less heat, more light.